Intel core i3 10100f or ryzen 1600af?

Question

Iron

Habrchane, welcome, I decided to assemble a PC for myself. I settled on the processors described in the question, I actually don’t know which one to choose. at Intel, the mother is more expensive, but the percent itself is cheaper, but in ryzen, on the contrary, tell me how to be. Landmark for a lower cost mother + percent and the possibility of overclocking.

Answer 1

ryzen has more cores (6 with 12 threads) than this intel (4 cores - 8 threads), but within one thread intel is faster , about 25%
The choice of amd is wrong, for the same money it is better to take AMD Ryzen 5 3500X , it has single thread rating is even higher than your intel, but the main l3 cache in amd is much higher (32mb) than intel (6mb), which means high performance will be more on typical (not synthetic as in tests) tasks, so take it ryzen 5 3500x

Answer 2

You don't need acceleration.
Grab the Ryzen 7 2700 (no X) - it's the best price/performance processor out there.
And it costs a little more.
Proofs here:
Multi-threaded performance on the euro

Answer 3

Motherboards cost about the same money if we are talking about boards with normal functionality and a high-quality component base. What is the difference between a cheap motherboard and an expensive one, on a similar chipset , you can look here
If you need the most versatile option for an upgrade, then the following options are possible:
then switch to a more productive solution);
2) Ryzen 7 2700 or Ryzen 6 3600 + B450/X470/B550 (see what processors and what memory the mother supports in advance. On the manufacturer's website);
Yes, it will come out a little more expensive than expected, but it will already have the necessary comfortable minimum performance (not to be confused with the minimum performance).
There is no universal pill here. There are tasks and platform optimization for them. I see no reason to take i5 with the "K" index (it's easier to upgrade to i7 / i9 later if the performance is not enough).

Answer 4

The Core i3 and Ryzen 3 are nothing to look forward to, as long as light surfing and working in Word is your future.
Now even surfing is not particularly easy, given how fat the average Web is getting fat every year. 99% of purchases of equipment from the lower segment are impractical.
Therefore, it makes sense to choose at least from Core i5, Ryzen 5 or more powerful.

Answer 5

Watch tests on youtube

Answer 6

The component market is dense.
In the end, we buy performance - Well, like the number of useful results per second.
Clock speed, number of cores, manufacturing process, etc... is NOT usually the main indicator of performance.
The PRICE of the question usually allows you to evaluate the result.
That is, if the Intel processor + mother = Price of the AMD processor + mother, then most likely the overall performance of these sets will be commensurate. The same goes for Nvidia graphics cards that cost $300 in performance to be equal to a $300 AMD graphics card.
Example: I chose AMD, which has a Vega 11 video accelerator integrated into the processor, which allows you to buy a processor and get the opportunity to play not very heavy video games in your free time. At Intel, such pleasure will require an external video card. Well, in general, you can maneuver at the level of preferences, you can’t get a fundamental win.
PS I am categorically against overclocking. "Everything is stolen before us."
Romantic "Hackers" suggest that at the factory, the manufacturers did NOT overclock the components to the limit. That is, what is written on the box is the maximum mode that guarantees (though not always) stable operation of the computer for a long period of time.