How would you rate this layout?

Question

HTML

Good day to all. I finally finished my first responsive layout! Please give an assessment, comrade experts.
From the very beginning, I chose the layout for a long time and painfully, still not understanding what it should be, or simple, which will then be converted into an adaptive one, or already immediately sharpened for an adaptive one. Having shoveled a lot of things, asking questions about what this cherished PSD should be, I got more and more confused and in the end, spitting, I decided that I would typeset the first one that came across ... and here it is.
Even at the preparation stage, I tried to find out how everything happens in real web studios!? The designer gives several layouts or only one, and there the layout designer will have to deal with it. Opinions were divided, and I decided that I would type from one, because. I wrote already above, I did not find options with several layouts.
Not having the skills of usability and other feng shui layout, I set the so-called breakpoints based on my views ... what happened to you to judge. But with the size of the browser window reduced, I tried to remove unnecessary "decorations" and leave more information. In general , onetown.hol.es turned out to be responsive from a non-responsive layout. Thanks in advance for the replies.

Answer 1

I really like it, it turned out great. The only thing that confuses me a little is the lack of hover effects and cursor:pointer on the button in the Subscribe block.
And some "nitpicks" on the code: 1) you carry
scripts from head
down the page 2) a could not be wrapped in div . And strong should be used with care, it denotes high importance, so it is better to use simpler tags for styling, for example, a regular span or b

<div class="logo">
    <a href="#"><strong>. one</strong>town</a>
</div>

3) it is undesirable to use h1 on the page more than once, in html5 it is allowed, but seo-shniks usually swear for this
4) instead of this horror
you can use the placeholder attribute for a long time
5) styles for ie can be put into a separate css-file, and loaded only for IE
6) elements like arrows, dots, lines can be made in css, not pictures ;-)
And so for the first time it's more than great!!) Beautiful, valid and fast!

Answer 2

In general, not bad and fast, but at low resolutions the text becomes too small.

Answer 3

It's not even bad for the first works)
Shl. In real web-studios, the layout designer swears at the designer, and the designer at the layout designer: D
I give you a tooth!)))

Answer 4

Hello, leave your contact please, I have a couple of questions for you about layout