L
L
Leevz2018-09-26 15:13:54
Mathematics
Leevz, 2018-09-26 15:13:54

How to prove that there are no three such digits (0-9) whose sum of squares is 172?

Conditions of the problem: there is a three-digit natural number n, as well as a function K(n), which sums the squares of the digits of this number. Does there exist a three-digit number n whose value in the function K(n) is 172 (to be proved)?

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

2 answer(s)
M
Mercury13, 2018-09-26
@Leevz

Bust.
98x - doesn't work
97x - doesn't work
96x - doesn't work
95x - doesn't work
94x - doesn't work
93x - x is too big
88x - doesn't work
87x - doesn't work
86x - doesn't work
85x - x is too big
77x - does n't work
76x - x is already too big too big
66x - x and even more too big
172 is divisible by 4. Any square is divisible by 4 with a remainder of 0 or 1 - therefore we must have three even numbers.
The overhead is reduced.
88x - it doesn't work
86x - x is already too big
66x - x is even too big, it makes no sense to sort it out further.

R
Rsa97, 2018-09-26
@Rsa97

So go through all the numbers from 100 to 999 and see. Or do you need an analytical proof?

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question