Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
How do you prefer to use the laradok: on a project-by-project basis or one for all projects?
The documentation describes two ways to work with larades, one larade - one project, one larade - all projects. What scheme do you prefer and why? It seems like one to one sounds more flexible, but is it really? What are the advantages and disadvantages of each scheme?
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question