Failover storage for a virtualization cluster project

Question

Clustering

There is a task to make a cluster of two servers (Linux) for a KVM virtualization system with 2 storage systems. In fact, you need something like a "mirror" for storage.
Advise what is better to use for such solutions?

Answer 1

NetApp series FAS + HP / DELL / etc
or Nutanix read in Russian here

Answer 2

Thanks for the answer.
We probably won’t speak for Nutanix, because it’s not clear how much this solution costs and what are the benefits.
NetApp FAS + HP/DELL/etc series - you write about conventional storage systems.
Let's say NetApp FAS2240 has mirroring on a regular basis? How is it all organized technically?

Answer 3

So what's the problem with asking? In any case, you will have to ask the price, it is not in the "open access" of anyone.
In general - it costs comparable to others, if you want a starship - there will be a price from a starship. If you want to be more budget-friendly, this happens ( www.nutanix.com/dip-your-toe-bundles/). But in any case, "from brands" will not be cheap.
If you want a turnkey solution, get ready to pay. Or spend your personal time smoking mana, which, in the case of a commercial decision, was smoked by their authors, for which they take their money. :)