Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Does Java have (remain) advantages? (e.g. before C++?) Is Java alive at all?
In light of recent developments in Java licensing, the question is whether it makes sense to start new projects in Java? (And also generally use Java-related technologies?) There can be a huge number of long-term negative effects due to a license change. (It may not be). (And that all colleagues are panicking).
1. Big companies will get off Java. May be. Lots of little ones too. May be. (Elasticsearch will no longer be supported in the future, problems with deeplearning4j).
2. No more free enterprise and non-enterprise testers. Maybe.
3. Smooth reduction in the number of supported frameworks. Questionable (for me) is Spring's long-term support.
4. People will be retrained to other languages (non-jvm Scala, Rust, Haskell), the Java community will slowly die out, winter is coming in general.
What do you think, is it really that bad? Does it make sense to start new with C++? Or look towards rust, haskell, and others? Or am I writing terrible nonsense?
It goes without saying that each tool is suitable for its own tasks, but often the time limit and ready-made frameworks / github repositories determine the choice of language, and then there is nothing more permanent than temporary solutions.
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Is Java now paid?
1. Big companies will get off Java. May be. Lots of little ones too. May be. (Elasticsearch will no longer be supported in the future, problems with deeplearning4j).No
2. No more free enterprise and non-enterprise testers. Maybe.wrong
3. Smooth reduction in the number of supported frameworks. Questionable (for me) is Spring's long-term support.No
4. People will be retrained to other languages (non-jvm Scala, Rust, Haskell), the Java community will slowly die out, winter is coming in general.No
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question