Does Habrahabr take into account the non-reactive reading option?

Question

Habr

I regularly read Habra. That is, I go every day when there is more or less free time.
Usually during the week I look through the list of articles in separate hubs for a certain period of time (usually for the past month or from today to the last week before last), skimming through and, if the material is of interest, I put it off for Sunday or evening reading.
The more interesting and important the article - the more thoughtfully I want to read - the later it will happen.
As a result, I almost never have the opportunity to vote either for an article or for comments on it.
It turned out that the time allotted for voting is only three days.
After a week, the activity in the comments drops to zero. According to my observations, comments on the first day are more actively evaluated and commented on than those that appeared a week later. It seems to me that this circumstance extinguishes the desire of Khabrovites to leave comments in a week, month, year.
In this regard, the question is: is the voting and commenting habr system designed only for reactive readers, and do I need to be content with the passive reader mode?
PS I'm not talking about news posts that are inherently momentary. This refers to “eternally relevant” posts: solutions to the Poisson problem, SOLID, principles of reactive programming, etc.

Answer 1

Habr takes into account the "non-reactive" ( as you called it ) reading option. Those who are interested in what they write in the comments subscribe to the comments. They can track new comments in the tracker or by receiving them by email.
It is quite logical that comments in the first days of publication are more actively evaluated and commented on, because even those who are not particularly interested in discussions come in to read a new article and may catch their eye on one or another comment.
It is not very clear how you present a resource designed for readers with your model of visiting the resource. Do you want the administration of the resource to forcibly notify everyone without exception that some noun has left a new comment on an article that they visited a week or a month ago, and they are required to read and evaluate it? This is absurd.