Courses are a tax on stupidity or what?

Question

Career in IT

Quite often I notice such courses SQL Fundamentals . This course costs 4500 rubles. According to the description, you can go through it yourself in two or three weeks. All information is on the Internet, free of charge, accessible and chewed.
I'm just wondering what it looks like from the employer's point of view. Here comes a person with a certificate from a geek***** and what does he think of the candidate? Is he goal oriented or lazy?
I have not watched these courses for how long, for me it is too long. Most of the courses can be completed in 3x-5x faster than in reality.
UPD:
I completely forgot that I was once young and green, and that with the help of the layout course, I began to get into the essence at times, just faster than when you are completely inexperienced and don’t know where to go.
My resentment has more to do with the price of the basics course. It is rather strange to sell the basics from the basics for money.

Answer 1

Such courses are common information business. Beginners who want to get into IT and who do not understand what it is and how it is, while if they have learned to install chrome or firefox on their own and think that they are smarter than everyone else - a lot.
You can pay for courses in the following cases:
1. Courses with recognized certification - from Microsoft, Cisco, Oracle, you can be specific from the manufacturers of a product
2. Overview courses on a product / engine / technology of a more advanced level, but this should not be basic technology, and courses can't be expensive. This is usually a few hours at the most.
3. If the company pays for the courses
4. English, German, Japanese, in general, the humanities, individual tutoring in difficult areas - some kind of matan, design with practice.

Answer 2

Courses are a tax on stupidity

Yes. Haircut dough from naive fools-vaytishnikov, sucking articles on Habré about the shortage of programmers in IT.
Well, if I am called to interview such a person, then I will ask him if he is interested in IT in general or if he is an ordinary white-tech guy. If he is interested and just fills the exp and crusts - well, if yesterday's office plankton, who decided to "make $ 100,000, as they say in blogs", then "We will call you back."
That's all.

Answer 3

Courses are a tax on stupidity or what?

At such courses, they no longer teach the disciplines themselves, but write a resume and give self-confidence. In my last office, the mere mention of taking courses in the resume automatically marks the candidate as not suitable. This rule arose after about 20 people, when asked about technology from their own resumes, could not answer what kind of technology it was, except for something in the style of "well, they taught it in the courses."
Of course, you should not consider all courses not worthy of mention, the same cisco, microsoft, oracle prepare quite high quality.

Answer 4

I will answer as the author of this course.
It's not just some YouTube video tutorials or a bunch of rambling articles.
There is a full-fledged sequential curriculum with theory, practice and support.

Here comes a person with a certificate from a geek***** and what does he think of the candidate? Is he goal oriented or lazy?

It is important to understand that after the course a person comes to the employer not with a certificate, but with a set of skills. He didn't just look at the lessons or flip through the books. He has solved more than 250 tasks from different topics and of varying complexity and is already ready to perform real tasks at work.

It is rather strange to sell the basics from the basics for money.

Taking money for work (be it a course, a book or a consultation) is not strange.