Could there be gigabyte inflation?

Question

Telephony

By 2030, Japan plans to fully introduce 6g, which means the same 15 GB for which you pay 400-500 rubles, you can lose it in a couple of minutes. It turns out with the speed of the Internet, you will also need to increase the amount of available limit (well, unlimited will be overly expensive). So? Or will there still be people who will survive on 3 GB?

Answer 1

what can I say. I paid for the Internet and per minute and per megabyte. And for the width of the channel.
Who knows, maybe the monetization scheme will change completely.
For example, they will enter an individual user number and
you will only have to pay for the right to access the network from any device, and in paying for content services, part of the cost
will be like a traffic tax.
And I had a similar moment in my life with wired providers. When the limit of paid traffic I could choose during the day.

Answer 2

By 2030, Japan plans to

Already have an official plan, standard, laws and contracts with operators and builders?
Do you know what 6G is? Or just read somewhere...
Your calculations are wrong. If we think so, then the same 15 GB today we should spend in one hour.
It's a virtual value, like your rating on a toaster. It has nothing to do with the real world and is determined solely by the company's pricing policy, depending on the market situation.
Not all people need the Internet, even these 3 GB.

Answer 3

And why will the "lost GB" increase? Opened pages, etc., after all, will remain the same size.

Answer 4

Maybe. And will be. It's unavoidable. What used to be considered impossible, or simply overkill, is now in the order of things. For example, in the early 2000s, if someone asked if it was possible to download a film on the Internet? With dial-up channels and tariffs of 100r / 5MB or for 1 hour of Internet (there were different, both in terms of traffic and time) - I usually answered "you can, but you will download for a week, and you will go bankrupt on the Internet." Further, the movies on the disks were in mpeg4, and 700MB in size, just enough to fit on a disc. Yes, and they were larger, but it was already more difficult to get, and more expensive - if you could burn a bunch of small movies on DVD at once, and they looked quite good on a 15 "monitor, then higher resolution / quality occupied the entire disk, and on small Monitors didn't make much of a difference.
Then came HD, FullHD, ... then stereo movies (almost 2 times the size increases). With the increase in channels and ways of using can (and should) change. If earlier on every computer you could find a collection of pictures (!), clips and all sorts of videos, now it would never occur to anyone to store it - why, if you can quickly and easily find it and watch it online? And now, at home, many movies are on disks in good quality, and in sizes of tens of gigs, because the channel will not allow you to watch it online with the same quality. But what if latencies are even lower and 10Gb/s speeds are commonplace? - I'm not going to practically save movies, and use disks only for backups or some other important data of my own.
There are many more examples that could be given, but think for yourself.