Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Common (non-text) datasets to test classification algorithms?
I have some classifier (a variation on the theme of the SVM classifier, if you like). I want to evaluate its accuracy, as well as how well it estimates the probability that such and such a point belongs to such and such a class.
I have to ask: what data sets are considered the most common for evaluating classifiers? If you like, the most textbook?
I am especially interested in non-text data, because I have a lot of text corpora anyway, but I would like to check on something else.
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
If something classic - Iris dataset - classification of iris flowers according to a small set of parameters. But this set is more of a toy set - there are too few samples.
More seriously, then MNIST digits is a classification of handwritten digits.
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question