Aws s3 vs google drive?

Question

Amazon Web Services

Hello. What is the best storage to use google drive VS aws s3???
If you calculate it this way, then only in storage at s3 it will take about 57 UAH per 100GB + another fee for requests. And Google disk has 45 UAH, for the same 100 gigs. But Google Drive doesn’t have a fee for getas and posts, or does it? I don't see it yet.
It turns out that Google drive is more profitable. Or is there a pitfall here?
They say it's better to use s3, but they haven't explained why yet.
The storage problem is this:
Initially, I wanted to find a contraption for storing files that the user can download upon purchase.
Now, having seen from competitors that avatars are loaded from s3, I think to store user avatars as well
And since you can store the files that you receive upon purchase, you can also store the photos that describe this product at the same time. (there are about 5 for one item)

Answer 1

s3 is a larger product and is used for secure storage and distribution of static files via the Internet, while the drive is for storing personal files that are not distributed over the Internet and are not put on the site)

Answer 2

I think you are slightly confusing products and their purposes here.
These products are used for personal file storage and all tools are focused on working with your personal files:
Amazon: Amazon drive vs Google: Google Drive
These are usually used for the purposes you described:
Amazon: AWS S3 vs Google : Google Cloud Storage
For your purposes, they may also be suitable:
for Microsoft : Azure block blobs
for DO : Digital Ocean spaces (compatible with AWS S3)
for Yandex: Yandex Object Storage (compatible with AWS S3)
for Mail.ru:S3 object storage ( compatible with AWS S3 )
from Alibaba : Alibaba Cloud object storage service
You can choose what suits your taste, price, and proximity to your customers