Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
Answer the question
In order to leave comments, you need to log in
I see no reason to use apache (unless of course you have some specific things for which nginx is not suitable)
I've tried this and that. With nginx + uswgi things get easier and somehow straight forward.
Even massvirtualhosting, beloved by Apaches, turns out to be simpler and more versatile - so I can easily give each host a separate configuration and even a separate version of php, as well as python (2.7 / 3.2), ruby and what else uwsgi supports.
nginx + uwsgi. The fact is that nginx is a very very flexible web server, so I don’t even recommend looking at Apache, plus nginx works great with static. There are very cool things for nginx like X-Accel-Redirect ( http://vds-admin.ru/nginx/kontroliruemye-skachivaniya-v-nginx ), it allows you to control static and not only =).
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Ask your questionAsk a Question
731 491 924 answers to any question