D
D
drakulavl2018-03-14 10:13:53
.NET
drakulavl, 2018-03-14 10:13:53

A technology stack for developing an enterprise application with a desktop client?

Good afternoon!
There was a task to develop a corporate client-server application.
Mandatory conditions:
- desktop client under Windows;
- processing on the server side;
- remote DB.
Please help with the choice of technology stack, googling could not find an unambiguous option
asp.net MVC (server) + Window Froms (client),
php (server) + Windows Forms (client),
no matter what (server) + what is generally possible (client) - is this even possible?
Browser client is strictly not accepted.
Thanks in advance!

Answer the question

In order to leave comments, you need to log in

5 answer(s)
C
cicatrix, 2018-03-14
@drakulavl

If the browser client is not accepted, why do you need asp.net? TCP/IP is not alive by the web alone.
Specify whether a server is needed at all, if its entire task is reduced to the function of laying between the client and the database, only the client + server database can be dispensed with.
Write the client on anything. If you put C# in the tags, WinForms is a logical choice (you can use WPF, of course, but it doesn't make much sense).
If the server is still needed, then you can write the windows service in the same C # (server = not necessarily a web server)

D
d-stream, 2018-03-14
@d-stream

You can also look in the direction of the three-link.
Only now WinForms - definitely in the trash. Look towards WPF.
With the proper organization of the architecture, you will get a design that will allow you to embed a web client side by side (this may be required in one or another version of integration with external services / website / mobile clients)

A
Alexander Yudakov, 2018-03-14
@AlexanderYudakov

Client: WPF.
Server: C# on HttpListener.
Transport: tls > http > json
At a minimum, two exe files + 2 dlls are needed:
1) on the client:
- Client.exe - client application launcher: checks for updates, downloads other files from the server if necessary, transfers control to UserInterface.dll
- Common.dll - contains program code that is common for both the client and server parts;
- UserInterface.dll - contains code specific to the client side.
2) on the server:
- AppServer.exe - runs as a Windows service, contains server-specific code;
- Common.dll - contains program code that is common for both the client and server parts.
Tried many times.

#
#, 2018-03-14
@mindtester

1 - well, not a fact about forms (immediately in trash) - it all depends on the complexity of the client side. a simple client on forms will be easier to create and maintain (there are beautiful faces, it’s enough to correctly ask a question here or to search engines) if the functionality is complex, there are a lot of repeating elements, you need reliable binding - then yes, wpf
2 - if the server is an intracorporate one - you can directly with The database should work, again it all depends on the complexity of the business logic, it might be worth looking at SignalR there are cases / demos right here under the client’s desktop
unambiguous advice is impossible - any task / team has features, there are differences in skills and resources as required , and existing ones
if we are talking about a small office, where everything is already on win10 - why not immediately consider UWP?
if suddenly you ALREADY have a license for MS SQL - add SSRS and perhaps 90% of the needs will be covered by a ready-made free UWP client ?

D
drakulavl, 2018-03-14
@drakulavl

cicatrix d-stream mindtester Thanks for the advice!
Now I have outlined two options for myself:
1) Try to push the web application;
2) Use the cicatrix option - win service + win forms

Didn't find what you were looking for?

Ask your question

Ask a Question

731 491 924 answers to any question